Advancing against the odds: Lessons from CEE and SEE ranking leapfroggers

The report examines ranking dynamics across CEE and SEE, identifies a select group of universities that have achieved substantial gains, and distils the practices underpinning their progress.

You can also request a complimentary analysis tailored to your institution.

Advancing against the odds: Lessons from CEE and SEE ranking leapfroggers

Executive Summary

Approximately one in three CEE and SEE universities appearing in the same subject ranking five years ago and today have risen substantially, strengthening their position as international challengers.

This is notable because the upper tiers remain highly stable and dominated by the Anglosphere, an advancing East Asia, and the strongest Western and Northern European systems—broadly reflecting the global distribution of economic resources and academic influence.

We analysed six years of ranking data to identify “leapfrogger universities” that progressed despite competing with significantly better-funded peers. Based on interviews and analysis of their research performance, visibility and strategic development, four lessons emerge:

  1. 1. Structural disadvantages make strategic focus essential.

    Broad-based efforts are unlikely to overcome differences in resources and reputation. Universities need to concentrate investment where they have the strongest potential to advance.

  2. 2. Meaningful improvements are possible within a single ranking cycle.

    Stronger institutional housekeeping, reliable data and clear responsibilities, ensures that performance is accurately captured. Focused visibility management makes existing strengths more recognisable internationally.

  3. 3. Substantial progress requires sustained institutional development.

    Over a three- to four-year horizon, capability development can strengthen research performance and educational quality, while ecosystem positioning through alliances and partnerships expands access to talent, knowledge, resources and reputation.

  4. 4. Each leapfrogger follows an institution-specific path.

    Successful examples provide direction but cannot be replicated mechanically. Each university must identify its distinctive strategic assets and build a focused approach around them.

Key Numbers

CEE and SEE universities in the QS subject top 200

26 → 42

Between 2020–2026, +62%

Rest of Europe universities in the QS subject top 200

392 → 446

2020–2026 · +14%

Regional universities that leapfrogged

22 of 65

Approximately one in three

Leapfrogger
A university that reached a meaningful ranking position after substantial improvement since 2020.
Growth in top-200 subject-ranking representation
CEE and SEE +62%
Rest of Europe +14%
Leapfrogger universities by country
Poland 5
Hungary 5
Czechia 4
Greece 3
Romania 3
Estonia 1
Slovenia 1

Source: Solutions Lab analysis of QS and THE rankings, 2020–2026.

PERSONALIZED INSIGHTS

Interested in a personalized report for your institution?

Register your interest, and we will get back to you shortly with a tailored analysis of your university — free of charge.

  • A tailored benchmark against comparable institutions
  • An analysis of ranking strengths and improvement opportunities
  • Practical recommendations tailored to your institution

What your personalized report will look like

Illustrative analysis

Institutional ranking analysis

Prepared for University of Example

Solutions Lab

Sample report · 2026

Your University’s WUR performance

World University Rankings performance, 2022 to 2026 Illustrative. The QS ranking band improves from 801-1000 to 601-800 by 2025. The THE ranking band improves from 1001-1200 to 801-1000 by 2024. 601 - 800 801 - 1000 1001 - 1200 20222023202420252026 601 - 800 801 - 1000
QS WUR THE WUR

Peer group

N National rival R Regional target

Rankings where your University is…

Name Better Equal Worse
🇭🇺 University A N 2 3 1
🇭🇺 University B 4 1 0
🇦🇹 University C R 1 1 4
🇵🇱 University D 2 2 2
🇨🇿 University E 3 2 1

Subject-level snapshot

Ranking Subject 2026 position vs 2025
QS Chemical Eng. 151 - 200 50
QS Civil & Structural Eng. 201 - 275 = 0
QS Mechanical Eng. 251 - 300 50
THE Engineering 501 - 600 = 0
THE Computer Science 601 - 800 new

Insights & recommended actions

  • Employer reputation ranks among the top 20% globally in QS WUR. Build on existing asset and scale up corporate partner activation.
  • International recruitment has been on the uptick, reaching 15% last year. Ensure that student support services can support further growth.
  • External visibility continues to trail regional peers. Overhaul the website and content structure to make your University’s strengths easier to find.
  • Research impact is not keeping pace with peers. Focus on high-impact fields and connect researchers better to international networks.
/ GET IN TOUCH /

Contact Us

Have a question or project in mind? We'd love to hear from you.